![google beyondcorp paper google beyondcorp paper](https://www.zscaler.com/cdn-cgi/image/format%3Dauto/sites/default/files/images/blogs/----category-images/cyber-security/zscaler-blog-cyber-security-1%402x.jpg)
Unsurprisingly, attempting to deal with only HTTP requests proved inadequate, so we had to provide solutions for additional protocols, many of which required end-to-end encryption (e.g. As the AP was the only mechanism that allowed employees to access internal HTTP services, all internal services were required to migrate behind the AP. At the moment, Access Proxy implements both the Web Proxy and the SSH gateway components, according to the terminology used in the previous article. Our implementation of the AP is generic enough to let us implement logically different gateways using the same AP codebase. To address this challenge, Google implemented a centralized policy enforcement front end Access Proxy (AP)-to handle coarse-grained company policies. A conventional approach might integrate each back end with the device Trust Inferer in order to evaluate applicable policies however, this approach would significantly slow the rate at which we're able to launch and change products.
#Google beyondcorp paper how to
One particular challenge was figuring out how to enforce company policy across all our internal-only services. In migrating to the BeyondCorp model (previously discussed in BeyondCorp: A New Approach to Enterprise Security and BeyondCorp: Design to Deployment at Google), Google had to solve a number of problems. We also touch on some of the projects we're currently undertaking to improve the overall user experience for employees accessing internal applications. It focuses on the Access Proxy, the challenges we encountered in its implementation, and the resulting lessons we learned in its design and rollout. This article details the implementation of BeyondCorp's front end infrastructure.